If you ever wondered about the depth of corruption in the   state-run media is, read this…
 Barack Obama is the worst jobs president since the Great Depression  and possibly is the worst jobs president in US History.

(Source: 
US Misery  Index) 
The democrats wanted to fundamentally change America.  They did.
The US unemployment rate has not  fallen below 10.8 percent in the last 12 13 months.  This is  unprecedented.
 And then there’s this…
Jobless claims rose  “unexpectedly” last week to the highest level in 9 months.
 But you sure wouldn’t know Obama is the worst jobs president since  the Great Depression from the state-run media.  They sure aren’t going  to bring that up before the election!
 Now compare the non-reporting on Obama’s failed policies to the  reporting during the Bush years.
The Media  Research Center reported on how the corrupt media discussed the 5.4  unemployment rate during the election in 2004.
 When Bill Clinton ran for re-election in 1996, the  unemployment rate was 5.2 percent, inflation was three percent and  economic growth was 2.2 percent. Sound good? The economy is just as  good, if not better, right now: the unemployment rate is 5.4 percent,  inflation is 2.7 percent, and economists’ consensus forecast for  economic growth this quarter is 3.7 percent. 
 Yet a new study by Dan Gainor, Director of the MRC’s  Free Market  Project, found that while the national media mainly cheered the Clinton  economy in 1996 (85 percent positive), reporters have mostly jeered the  Bush economy in 2004 (77 percent negative). Two 2004 stories were judged  as neutral.
  Even when the economy was producing 144,000 jobs a month  and the unemployment rate was 5.4% in September 2004 the state-run  media twisted the story into a negative.
The Media  Research Center again reported:
 The unemployment rate fell a tenth to 5.4 percent in  August as 144,000 jobs were created during the month and the job  creation number for July was revised upward by more than double, from  32,000 to 73,000 new jobs, but all the networks on Friday night managed  to turn the Labor Department numbers, released that morning, into a  negative.
 CBS’s John Roberts ran a soundbite of President Bush  touting the 5.4 percent rate, but then he undermined  the good news: “What the President didn’t say was that the employment  numbers in August again fell short of expectations, and it is now  certain he will end his first term as the first President since the  Great Depression to lose jobs on his watch.” Roberts grew even more dire  as he stressed how “the situation is worse than it seems. While the  President touts the results of his economic recovery plan, job creation  hasn’t kept up with population growth.” 
 …Later, on CNN’s NewsNight, John King offered only a  brief mention of the subject in a larger campaign story: “The President  sought a silver lining in new economic data that Democrats suggest is a  major Bush weakness, a modest addition of just 200,000 jobs the past  two months.” Joe Johns highlighted a charge made by Kerry: “My friends,  at the rate that this administration is creating jobs, you’re not going  to have a net-plus one job in the state of Ohio until the year 2011!” 
  The corrupt media even reported   a Clinton unemployment rate of 5.4% as good but declared a Bush  unemployment rate of 5.0% as bad.
 That is how the state-run media reported the unemployment rate when  it was 5% during the Bush years.  Could you even imagine if that number  would have been close to 10% like it is today?  They would have lynched  Bush and Cheney on the White House lawn.  And yet you don’t hear the  democratic-media complex saying boo about Obama’s failed economic  policies despite the fact that Obama himself took  ownership of the economy over a year ago.
 Now tell me the leftwing media is not corrupt!
Related:A Year After Claiming Economy Was His… Obama Blames Bush AgainWorst.  President.  Ever.A year ago Obama was bragging to audiences that the economy was his…
“Give  It To Me!”
But, that was before his disastrous policies took effect and stifled  growth, increased unemployment and raised debt to dangerous new levels.
Now, he’s out blaming Bush again.
The  Hill reported:
 President Obama this summer has repeatedly blamed George  W. Bush for the nation’s economic woes, a year after he took ownership  of the economy and criticized those who “carp and gripe.”
 The White House’s effort to tie congressional Republicans to Obama’s  predecessor comes less than three months before the midterm elections.  But the president’s campaign speeches this summer contrast to a speech  he delivered in Michigan last year when his approval ratings were 17  points higher.
 During a July 14, 2009, address  in Warren, Mich., Obama said, “Now, my administration has a  job to do, as well, and that job is to get this economy back on its  feet. That’s my job. And it’s a job I gladly accept. I love  these folks who helped get us in this mess and then suddenly say, ‘Well,  this is Obama’s economy.’ That’s fine. Give it to me. My job is  to solve problems, not to stand on the sidelines and carp and gripe.”
 At the time, the AP wrote, “With four simple words — ‘Give it to me’ –  President Barack Obama took possession of the economy.”
 Throughout this year, Obama has blamed Bush and the criticism has  intensified this month.
 On Aug. 9 in Bush’s home state of Texas, Obama said the  ex-president’s “disastrous” policies had damaged the economy, noting  that Bush inherited budget surpluses and ended his time in the White  House with a budget deficit.
 During a fundraiser with Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) in Seattle this  week, Obama said, “Eighteen months ago I took office after nearly a  decade of economic policies that had given us sluggish growth, sluggish  job growth, falling incomes, falling wages and a record deficit.”
 What an awful leader.
gatewaypundit.firstthings.com